The ICO behind the tragic Everest stunt is now “airdropping” tokens from rockets
Remember ASKfm, the Ukraine-based social network that was encouraging people to climb Mount Everest in search of crypto tokens, while not telling them that a man who was guiding the climb, Lam Babu Sherpa, had died on the descent?
Unbelievably, we received an email with the following subject line on Sunday:
ASKfm kicks off a new stunt – this time without killing a sherpa
ASKfm’s PR representative told us they thought the email title might “grab [our] attention” which, we must say, it did.
Then we got to the body of the email (emphasis theirs):
ASKfm’s airdrop is quite literal as the ASQ Protocol – part of the ASKfm network – has taken its token into the troposphere with its most recent airdrop for users and the wider crypto community.
ASQ has launched a rocket into the skies above Scotland loaded with a Ledger Nano S that was dropped somewhere in the countryside. The launch vehicle, operated by Edinburgh-based space technology firm Skyrora, reached Mach 1.45 and a maximum altitude of over 6 kilometers before unloading its precious cargo into the world.
That’s right — ASKfm have once again gone for the making-a-metaphor-literal promo stunt.
The thinking behind burying the tokens at the top of Everest was that they would then be at “the closest starting point to reach the moon” — a reference to the “to the moon” rallying cry of crypto HODLers worldwide.
This time, they’re reifying the “airdrop”, a popular technique in initial coin offerings (ICO) like ASKfm’s, which involves giving out a certain number of crypto tokens for free as way of creating a buzz about the upcoming money-raising ICO. (ASKfm did not actually drop tokens out of the rocket; instead, part of the rocket parachuted into Northern Scotland carrying tokens and ASKfm took them out and buried them nearby because, er, Skyrora wanted its rocket back.)
We called up ASKfm’s CEO Max Tsaryk and asked whether it might be a little distasteful to be continuing with this kind of adventurous stunt given that a person had died during the last one. He told us:
We’re still doing promotional stunts, because we’re still doing the project. Even though this big tragedy happened during our first stunt, this time we made sure what we were doing was super-safe… This is just another PR campaign.
Just another PR campaign, indeed. But Tsaryk told us that whereas this time, he actually expects people to go after the tokens that the company says are worth $100,000 (though the public sale of the tokens needed to validate such claims for their value has not started), the Everest stunt was actually only that. The company never really thought people were going to go up the Himalayan mountain in search of the tokens (which have yet to be found):
This is just promotional stuff; there’s no big meaning. We’re not trying to ask 16-year-old teenagers to go to Everest, because we understand this is not possible… The purpose was PR. Unfortunately with a tragic story, but it was not our meaning… We weren’t pushing for anyone to actually go and find this ledger, this was more of an entertainment kind of thing.
Perhaps, the undiscovered tokens — or, better, the $100,000 they’re supposedly worth — should have been dug up and sent to Lam Babu Sherpa’s family.
The video promoting the tokens at the top of Everest is still on YouTube, with more than 30,000 views. Tsaryk said the company has stopped promoting it, but that it was really difficult to delete a video from the internet, and that was why it was still there. (The video features a strange man’s voice saying “ASKfm puts 100,000 dollars worth of tokens at Mount Everest. If you’re brave enough, go get them.”)
Tsaryk also told us that he had not known about the Sherpa’s death when the Everest stunt was being promoted, and that he only got confirmation of the death from our story. “You probably had more information than us,” he said.
The fact that our story had confirmed the Sherpa’s death — the CEO said he had only known the Sherpa was missing before that — and the notion that we had the most information seemed to rather contradict an interview published by Finance Magnates in May, in which Tsaryk spoke about our story and was quoted as saying:
A headline that talks about a death of a person and tarnishes someone’s reputation can bring much more traffic than a carefully conducted investigation, but it’s understandable that for the mainstream media, it’s not about facts, it’s about a controversial story.
Aside from its ICO, ASKfm is a “question-and-answer” format social network, which has had over 215m people sign up. Most of its users are teenagers — half are under 18. But ASKfm says that these marketing campaigns are “targeting a mature audience that could potentially invest in our project, not our user base”.
If any Alphaville readers still want to join in the company’s latest publicity stunt, here’s where they should dig:
A crypto stunt gone tragically wrong – FT Alphaville
- Beware the Hindenburg Omen?
- The broken conversation about financial regulation
- The improbably profitable, loss-making Blue Prism
- The EM rout is not made in America
- Wages and growth and honestly we just give up
- Britain’s first blockchain-enabled co-working space isn’t blockchain-enabled
- There is a FIRE that never goes out
- The WeWork Garden of Eden
- IQE: lumpy ‘Apple’ sauce at the pricey Cardiff chip shop
- There’s only so much a central bank can do alone
- Eight questions every first-time buyer should ask
- MiFID II: not all doom and gloom
- Tesla: getting to Q3 profitability
- Turkey contagion fears are overblown [Update]
- The chance of an inflation shock may be higher than you think
- Sorry Tim, the humanity is not being drained out of music
- Digital crop circles
- What could go wrong here?
- Sirius Minerals: money for a hole in the ground
- The Bank of England has a strange idea of what QE achieved
- One for the ladies…
- ‘Of course, many ridiculous papers appeared’
- Is a change goin’ to come?
- The capacity’s not there yet (and probably never will be)
- Musk and Tesla are not inseparable
- Libraries, from Carnegie to Bezos
- Crypto & government: from anarchy to amity in the USA
- ‘I’m sorry Dave, I’m afraid I cannot sanction this Series B round’
- RBC, through the FANG barrier
- Self-help to buy
- CFA: Chartered crypto analysts — updated
- The Netflix dilemma — updated
- Fujitsu’s new blockchain offering: really cheap or really expensive?
- Nothing But the Shirt on Your Back
- Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
- How to make a living in the cult of meritocracy
- Spotify: Drake-oil salesmen
- Oh, the digital humanity
- Building a blockchain Britain in Bloxwich, because …?
- Sports are not markets, predictions ain’t investment
- Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
- Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
- The node to serfdom
- Carney is down with the crypto kids
- Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
- It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
- Don’t blame it on the sunshine
- In corporate America, brands develop you
- One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
- Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
- Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
- Let’s not try make ‘crypto chicks’ a thing
- Tokens all the way down
- Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
- A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
- How to buy Italian fire insurance
- Atlas bugged
- Inflating inflation
- Crypto’s most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
- Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
- Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
- In defence of ticket touts
- Please don’t tell individual investors to buy leveraged loans
- RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
- Retail is not dead
- Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
- At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
- Egregious expectations – Intelsat edition
- Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
- Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
- Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
- Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
- “We’re very disappointed in you, Spotify”
- ‘Sex redistribution’ and the means of reproduction
- Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
- No entitlement crisis in America
- Free cash flow to whom?
- Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
- Human capital and the jobs guarantee
- This is a tech bubble, when’s the crash?
- The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
- FUD, inglorious FUD
- A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
- The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
- These hedge fund numbers can’t be right
- The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
- Lies, damn lies, and charticles
- The world doesn’t need more Elon Musks
- No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
- Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
- Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
- Amazon is not a bubble
- Japan’s economic miracle
- Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn’t like?
- Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
- Who needs the labels anyway?
- Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
- No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
- No one needs to buy Tesla
- How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
- Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
- Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
- The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
- Cigarettes are the vice America needs
- Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
- Musicians, don’t just blame the labels for your lack of dough
- Giving stock away to staff doesn’t absolve share buybacks
- A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
- Monopoly and its discontents
- A State of Mind
- America is not the least protectionist country in the world
- This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
- No Bloomberg, the world’s richest people did not lose $114bn…
- Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
- Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
- Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
- Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
- Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
- Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition
You may be interested
Litecoin [LTC/USD] Technical Analysis: Cryptocurrency support falls to a yearly lowEditor - October 21, 2018
[ad_1] Litecoin [LTC/USD] Technical Analysis: Cryptocurrency support falls to a yearly low AMBCryptoLitecoin (LTC) Price Analysis – October 19 CryptoGlobeFull coverage [ad_2]…
Deloitte Is Creating Blockchain Trust Layers Within CommerceEditor - October 21, 2018
[ad_1] Deloitte Is Creating Blockchain Trust Layers Within Commerce BitcoinistFull coverage [ad_2] Source link
The Onecoin ICO Doesn’t Appear to be Affilaited With OnecoinEditor - October 21, 2018
[ad_1] There has been a fair bit of talk regarding Onecoin over the past few years. This notorious MLM scheme…